This page is part of © FOTW Flags Of The World website

Hungary - Subdivisions (overview)

Last modified: 2001-08-10 by dov gutterman
Keywords: hungary | subdivisions | wolf teeth |
Links: FOTW homepage | search | disclaimer and copyright | write us | mirrors

by Antonio Broto, 7 August 2001

See also:


Subdivisions of Hungary (1 January 1999) - Hungary is divided to 19 county (megye), 1 capital (fováros) and 22 cities (like county by right / megyei jogú város). The cities are not part of the counties.
In 1 July 2000. many "large community" has became towns.
István Molnár, 4 July 2000

Most of the visited villages made a horizontal flag (ratio 2:3) and a vertical flag (ratio 5:2). The name of the horizontal flag is "zászló" or "lobogó", the name of the vertical flag is " "labarum" " or "függönyzászló"
István Molnár, 8 August 2000

Every piece of territory of Hungary must by law to be part of some community or city. In Hungary before we had five types of settlements:
1. Község (community).
2. Nagyközség (large community). This type of settlement does not really exist any more as a separate category. Before, communities, when their population became larger, were awarded with the title of "large community". Now, there is no specific procedure for the title "large community". All former large communities retain their title, but no such new titles are awarded. Now, all communities with a population of 5000 or more people can use the title of large community, without any official procedure, if they wish so. For example, the community, where I live, has 6000 people, but the title of large community is not used by the local authorities.
3. Város (city). The title of city is given by the head of state, there are no specific requirements, but in order to apply for the status of city, a community is expected to have a high school, permanent police station, permanent medical service, cultural institutions.
4. Megyei jogú város (city with right of county). Now the capitals of all counties are automatically given the title of "city with right of county" (before, only 16 of the 19 county capitals had such title, now all 18 (!) county capitals have this title). Also all cities with a population of 50 thousands can apply for this status. Now we have 3 cities with right of county that are not capital of any county. Cities with right of county are de iure not considered part of the county where they are located, but the de facto they are part of them (the only exception is Pest county, whose capital - Budapest - is outside the county, de iure and de facto). The main difference between a "normal" city and a "city with right of county" is that a normal city offer services only to its own habitants and to surrounding communities, while a "city with right of county" offer services to a larger region, including to surrounding cities.
5. Fováros (capital) - the capital is divided to smaller parts, disctricts, that have their own local autonomy, powers are shared with the capital's local autonomy.
Ivan Marinov, 14 March 2001

1. Község - I use the word: village. This settlement type exists from 1876. Before 1876 they were named as 'Falu' means village. The official name of these settlements are 'Község', the used version 'Falu'. In the 1900-1910s these settlements were named
'Kisközség' - It means 'Little Community' but I don't use the word "community" because it is not the same as the village (for example in Yugoslavia, Romania and Ukraine one community contains more settlements as a district).
Between 1950-1989 in Hungary there were some communities which contained more villages. These villages became independent settlements after 1989. In Slovakia too.
2. Nagyközség - This settlement type exists from 1876 when some formerly 'Mezováros' - means borough (town)- lost its town type rights and didn't become 'Rendezett Tanácsú Város' - means 'City with Council' (town). They became 'Nagyközség'. Most of them became town (last in August 2000: Harkány, Szob, Pannonhalma, Visegrád etc.). Inhabitants these formerly 'large villages' or 'large communities': Harkány: 3.587, Szob: 2.803, Pannonhalma: 3.524, Visegrád: 1.543.
3. Város - I always use the title 'town' when it is is a second class 'city-or-town'.
Towns in Hungary:
Before 1876: 'Mezováros' means borough or 'Kiváltságos Mezováros' means 'Privileged Borough' etc.
1876-1929: 'Rendezett Tanácsú Város' means 'City with Council'. The towns were under the county but not under the district administration.
1929-1950 'Megyei Város' means 'County Town'. Only the name was changed. 1950 is the end of the rights of self-government.
1950-1954 'Város' means 'City'. under the district and county soviets.
1954-1971 'Járási Jogú Város' means 'Town with District Rights' under the county soviet
1971-1989 'Város' means 'Town' under the county soviet
1989- 'Város' under the goverment of Hungary.
4. Megyei jogú város - I always use the title 'city' it is a first class 'city-or-town'. I use this word in Hungary at 'Megyei Jogú Város' in Romania at 'Municipiul' in Ukraine at Mukachevo, Uzhhorod and Hust which cities are not under the rayon  administrations. The cities (with county ranks) and the counties have got own 'General Assemblies' 'Közgyulés'.
Cities in Hungary:
Before 1876: 'Szabad Királyi Város' means 'Free Royal City'. Not under the county administration.
1876-1950: 'Törvényhatósági Jogú Város' means 'City with Municipal Rights'. Here is a translation problem again. The Municipality = Törvényhatóság, Önkormányzat in Hungarian. The translator thought Municipal Rights mean 'rights of the counties'. These settlements were not under the county administration. Most of them annexed in 1920.
1950-1954 there were no first class cities, only towns: 'Város'
1954-1971 'Megyei Jogú Város' means 'City with County Rights'. These settlements were: Debrecen, Miskolc, Pécs and Szeged. These settlements had the rights to divide their territories into districts. These settlements were not under the county soviet.
1971-1989 'Megyei Város' means 'County Town'. The fifth was Gyor. These settlements didn't have the rights to divide their territories into districts (exactly: no district soviets). These settlements was under the county soviet as a different part.
1989-1990 Some 'Város' became 'Megyei Város' for example Kecskemét and Székesfehérvár.
1990-1996 'Megyei Jogú Város' means 'City with County Rights' under the goverment of Hungary. 20 settlements became 'MJV' (which have more than 50.000 inhabitants).
1996- 22 settlements (Two county seats which haven't got 50.000 inhabitants - Szekszárd and Salgótarján became 'MJV') There is one town in Hungary which have got more than 50.000 inhabitants and not city: Érd.
In 2000 the government wanted the Parliament to give a title of 'Megyei Jogú Város' to the Town of Esztergom because its great historical past, but the Parliament didn't give it.
We have four cities with right of county that are not capital of any county: Dunaújváros, Hódmezovásárhely, Nagykanizsa and Sopron
Cities don't have representation in the General Assemblies of the County. They have to make an agreement with their counties. For example there was a really beautiful political war between Veszprém County and Veszprém City. The county hall is in the city... The villages and towns has got representation in the General Assembly of the County. Of course the cities are the parts of their counties by state administration. But 1990-1994 a high sheriff - 'Köztársasági  Megbízott' means 'Commissary of the Republic' looks after more than one counties. Levels of the courts of the justice. First level: towns (included cities) and districts (in Budapest). second level: counties and capital. The highest level: The Supreme Court.
5. Fováros - Budapest is the capital. The capital is divided into 23 districts which have own selfgovernments. There are political wars between the districts and the Council of the Capital about the rights and powers. The capital wants the districts become only local offices of the capital, the districts want the capital becomes one of the counties, not more.
6. Településrész (part-community) - Some areas of a larger settlement has its own local government with a some rights. For example: Szeged City has got three part communities: Kiskundorozsma, Tápé and Szoreg. The larger settlements (most of the cities) could divided their territories and could found part-communities. These part-communities could have got parts of the rights and powers of the settlement to their local works and problems. Not only cities have got part-communities. For example Monor town's part Monorierdo is a part-community. And some of them has got own symbols!

Information about counties. The county council is the assembly of the settlements of the county (without cities). The General Assembly is not over the local authorities.
Historical settlement type: 1984-1989 some 'large village' had got the title 'Városi Jogú Nagyközség' means 'Large Community with Town Rights'. They became later towns.
Formerly divisions: ' Járás' means districts. Historical divisions of the counties. They were discontinued in 1984. Divisions of the counties (of course without cities 1876-1971; 1990-now)
1876-1950: districts and towns
1950-1954: districts
1954-1971: districts and towns
1971-1984: districts, town's environs, towns and cities (!)
1984-1989: town's environs, towns, LCTRs, LCTR's environs, cities and some 'large village under direct county administration'
1990-now: towns and communities (villages)
István Molnár, 14 March 2001

I missed the 'Notarial Districts' 'Körjegyzoség'. Settlements which don't want to have got own office - because for example haven't got enough money - found 'ND' with others. Each settlement has got oun council and mayor but hasn't own Mayor's Office.
For example: I sent flag of Döbrönte and Ganna villages which settlements have got one 'ND'. Pictures was sent me by the District Notary of the Ganna-Döbrönte Notarial District by the authorization of the Mayor of Döbrönte village and the Mayor of Ganna village.
Bacause the 'ND' is only a common office of some settlements it got no symbols.
István Molnár, 14 March 2001

Wolf-teeth on Hungarian Subdivisions Flags

Ole Andersen asked following Gyarmat flag: "Are the top and bottom triangles a theme in Győr-Moson-Sopron Co.?"
It seems some designer standardizes. You can find triangles on the flag of Vaszar village , Veszprém Co, which settlemesnt is neighbouring to Gyarmat and so is Győrszemere. On the other hand, the flag of Szany large village has no triangles . More uniformised flags: Bársonyos, Kerékteleki, Bakonyszombathely, Réde.
István Molnár, 1 December 2000

Ole Andersen asked: "Could the triangle idea be borrowed from the city of Gyor?"
I think that this designer follows the triangles of the Army flags.
István Molnár, 2 December 2000

The coloured triangles set allong the flag edges are traditional and typical for Hungarian flags and also in flag traditions of the
countries where hungarian influence was stong (with that I mean not only those countries that were under Hungarian rule - like Croatia and Romania, but ulso those that ruled Hungary, like Austria). The pattern is called in Hungarian "wolf-teeth", if I am not much mistaken. It was used primarly on the flags of military units of (say) 17th and 18th century, and from there it was transfered to municipal flags in Hungary, to rank flags of Austria, and so on, to be used in modern times in various modifications in presidential standards of Central-European countires (Czech R., Slovakia, Austria, Croatia, Yugoslavia ...) and for example on Slovakian chief-of-town standard banners. The pure triangular teeth are, IMHO, still typical for Hungary while other nations around prefer to use some "more elaborate" variations (flamuly i.e. wavy trangles, chequy partterns, stripes of varuious interlacing etc.) The Hungarian military flags always used teh wolf-teeth, as far as I know and still do so. The usual hungarian pattern of flags with wolf-teeth is white (or buff) flag field with the (eablorate, full) coat of arms in the middle and wolf-teeth in main CoA colours around. The teeth may be of one colour, or two, one at upper and one at lower edge or interlaced along three edges. The most well known case of not using white (or buff) field for such flag are the Hungaian military flags of socialist period when they are red with white teeth IIRC.
Zeljko Heimer, 2 December 2000

I noted in several cases (e.g. at least twice driving though cities along Balaton) common versions of flags. One was a bicolour while the other was quartered in saltire. In any case, it seems that many subdivisions of Hungary have both ceremonial and more common versions of flags, which would not be quite unexpected comparing the national flag usage, too.
If I may say so without the research, the white flags with woolf-theeth (typical for Hungary, even if not maybe the most frequent) are much less prone to be CoA-less then more "clasical" designs.
Zeljko Heimer, 23 April 2001

Flags of the Hungarian Cities and Towns in 1941

In many pages there are images of historical flags which are based on the book by Dr. Szoll Sandor: Városaink neve, címere és lobogója . The book was printed in 1941. In this time these flags were on use in Hungary. Some of the settlements in the book was not part of Hungary in 1941. Some settlements used in 1941 the original flag given by the kings of Hungary in the 17-19th century. It seems no flag adopted in 1941. All flag was abandoned in 1949.
Some of them are still in use. They are:
Budapest (With or without CoA)
Miercurea-Ciuc (Romania)
Kecskemét (with CoA)
Komárom and Komárno (Slovakia)
Nyíregyháza (with CoA)
Budapest XX. (with CoA)
Sopron (but not vertical, horizontal divided)
see also:
István Molnár, 18 December 2000 and 28 Febuary 2001

Some of them is in use today:
Csíkszereda - now Miercurea Ciuc, RO.
Kézdivásárhely - now Targu Secuiesc, RO.,
Buda old flag - Budapest I. district
Kecskemét, HU (with CoA)
Pestszenterzsébet - Budapest XX. district (with CoA)
Nyíregyháza, HU (with CoA)
Budapest, HU (with CoA)
Esztergom, HU
Gyula, HU
Komárom, HU (with and without CoA)
Komárom - now Komárno, SK
Gyergyószenmiklós - now Gheorgheni, RO. relates to the old and renewed CoA
Marosvásárhely - now Targu Mures, RO. relates to the old and renewed CoA
Temesvár - now Timisoara, RO. this flag is in the old with new CoA.
Újpest - now Budapest IV, HU. relates the old and renewed CoA
Gyor, HU. relates the old and renewed CoA
Zenta - now Senta, YU. this flag relates the old CoA.

Flags that aren't in use today:
Baja, Békéscsaba, Cegléd, Csáktornya (Cakovec, HR), Csongrád, Debrecen, Eger, Gyöngyös, Gyor, Hajdúböszörmény, Hajdúnánás, Hajdúszoboszló, Hódmezovásárhely, Kaposvár, Kispest, Kolozsvár (Cluj, RO), Koszeg, Marosvásárhely (Targu Mures, RO), Mezotúr, Miskolc, Pápa, Pécs (but blue and yellow the colours of the flag), Szeged, Székesfehérvár, Szombathely, Vác, Veszprém, Zalaegerszeg.
István Molnár, 5 April 2001

Subdivisions Flags During the Communist Era

After 1949 the settlements couldn't use their flags and coats of arms. In the early 70's some of them created their own flag and CoA. The Soviet of the Ministers (the Government) made a resolution to regulate the creating and using these symbols. (The word "soviet" means council in the time of the communist era):

Resolution No. 1006/1974 (II.22.) of the Soviet of the Ministers about the creating and using local flag and coat of arms, and the granting title of the  honorary freeman.
1. The soviet has the right to creat and use local coat of arms and flag and grant title of the honorary freeman - according to this resolution. The rules of the creating and using of coat of arms and flag and the granting title of the hononorary freeman is determined in an order  by the soviet.  At the arrangement of the order the opinion of the inhabitants has to be known and considered.
2. Local coat of arms and flag could be created by the capital soviet, city soviet, town soviet, moreover the soviet of the large village and the village soviet - by the authorization given by the Office of the Soviets of the Soviet of the Ministers considered the suggestion of the executive comitee of the competent county soviet. The same rules are the standards to grant the title of honorary freeman.
3. The local coat of arms is the symbol which relates to the historical past and the nowadays typical character of the settlement; couldn't substitute the Coat of Arms of the Hungarian People's Republic. If the Coat of Arms of the Hungarian People's Republic have to be used at the time of the state administration, the local coat of arms couldn't be used. For the proposal of the local coat of arms the assent of The Lecturers of Fine Arts and Industrial Arts has to be asked.
4. The president of the soviet may permit to use of the coat of arms for not soviet organizations and he determines the conditions of the using.
5. The local coat of arms is not usable as a trade-mark for the soviet and not soviet organizations - based on the IX./1969 law about the trade-marks.
6. The local flag contains the local coat of arms and the administrative name of the settlement on an unicoloured material; couldn't substitute nor the flag of the Hungarian People's Republic either the Red Flag of the International Labour Movement.
7. The title of the honorary freeman could be granted for the excellent activity for the inhabitants of the settlement.
8. The costs of the creating and using local coat of arms and flag and granting title of the honorary freeman have to be payed by the local soviet.
9. The President of The Office of the Soviets of the Soviet of the Ministers provides for the execution of the resolution., comes to a decision in all disputed questions of execution (...)
10. This resolution becomes effective on the day of its proclamation. The orders of this resolution have to be used for the already created coat of arms and flags.

Lajos Fehér
Deputy President of the Soviet of the Ministers

This resolution is no longer valid after 1990.
István Molnár, 28 October 2000

It seems they are not in use. But some cities uses the same field as in 1974-1989 flags with the old CoA. For example Debrecen and Szeged. Maybe (only maybe) Balatonfured use its 1974-1989 flag, because the settlement use its CoA from 1974-1989.
István Molnár, 18 December 2000

CHANNELS :: Compare Country infoCountry guide & StudyFlagsMapsSightseeingTravel WarningsHotel Directory DESTINATIONS :: AsiaAfricaCaribbean Middle EastNorth AmericaSouth AmericaCentral AmericaOceania PacificEuropePolar Regions UTILITIES :: WeatherWorld TimeISD CodesTravel Links Link Exchange
DestinationsMonuments WONDERS :: AncientModernNatural | Privacy Policy